Overview of abortion related history
Offences Against the Person Act makes abortion unlawful.
Section 58, states:
"Every woman being with child who with intent to procure her own miscarriage shall unlawfully administer to herself any poison or noxious thing or shall unlawfully use any instrument or other means whatsoever with the like intent and whosoever with intent to procure the miscarriage of any woman whether or not she be with child shall unlawfully administer to her or cause to be taken by her any poison or other noxious thing or shall unlawfully use any instrument or other means with the like intent, shall be guilty of felony..."
Section 59 states:
"Whosoever shall unlawfully supply or procure any poison or other noxious thing or any instrument whatsoever knowing that the same is intended to be unlawfully used or employed with intent to procure the miscarriage of any woman, whether she be or not be with child, shall be guilty of a misdemeanour..."
In the English case of R. v. Bourne (1938) in which the defendant, the gynaecologist Aleck Bourne, had performed an abortion on a girl who had been raped, the jury upheld the judge's view that an abortion could lawfully be done to prevent the mother from becoming "a physical or mental wreck." On this view of the law, abortion was allowed on serious medical grounds, but abortion on demand was certainly unlawful.
The Treaty of Rome, which came into force in 1958, created the European Economic Community of which Ireland became a member in 1972
In England in 1966 The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Bill (which became the Abortion Act 1967) came before Parliament leading to abortion on demand. Aleck Bourne, the gynaecologist who had instigated the landmark court case of 1938, had become increasingly appalled that his case was being used to justify the new legislation, and became a founder member of Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (UK).
Lord Steel, architect of the 1967 Abortion Act
Opposition to the proposed liberalisation of the abortion law was at that time supported by the British Medical Association and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, bodies which only became dominated by a more permissive approach to abortion several years after the new law was implemented.
Ireland joins the European Economic Community and becomes subject in some instances to the European Commission for Human Rights and the European Court for Human Rights.
When Ireland began negotiations to enter the EC, it was evident that certain articles of the Irish Constitution were in direct conflict with EC law as established by ECJ decisions, including Costa, Van Gend en Loos, and Internationale Handelsgesellschaft. This Part describes the steps taken by Ireland to enable it to ratify a Treaty of Accession and become a Member State. It was crucial for Ireland to amend its Constitution, and by doing so, EC law became binding in Ireland. Ireland voted to allow EC law to take priority over Irish law, including Ireland's Constitution. Through an analysis of Ireland's Constitution, the amendments necessary to conform with EC case law, and the challenges to those amendments, this Part will establish that EC law is now Irish law.
Ireland passes the Health Family Planning Act which reaffirmed the anti-abortion portions of the Offences Against the Person Act.
The Irish people vote, in a two-to-one majority, in September to protect and acknowledge the right to life of the unborn child in a Constitutional Amendment.
Article 40.3.3 states
"The State acknowledges the right to life of the unborn and, with due regard to the equal right to life of the mother, guarantees in its laws to respect, and, as far as practicable, by its laws to defend and vindicate that right."
In 1985 student unions were distributing pro-abortion information. The first case challenging the Eighth Amendment was Attorney General ex rel. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children Ireland Ltd. v. Open Door Counselling Ltd. ("SPUC v. Open Door"). The High Court ruled that the counselling and assisting of pregnant women to travel abroad to obtain an abortion was illegal under Article 40.3.3. The High Court, awarding injunctive relief, found that the defendants' activities amounted to a restrainable activity. More interestingly, the High Court determined that EC law did not apply because the proceedings and the defendants' activities were limited to activities within the State. The defendants' contention that EC law entitled them to operate was rejected.The High Court ruling was upheld on appeal to the Supreme Court where Chief Justice Finlay dismissed all issues raised by the appellants.
In 1992 the European Commission and Court on Human Rights determined that those restrictions are not valid.
Irish High Court issues an injunction against students providing information on overseas abortion services.
The X Case Judgement, which ruled that a 14 year rape victim could travel to England for an abortion, allowed for abortions to be perfomed up to nine months on grounds of mental health, including the risk of suicide. Legislation has not been passed on this ruling
Prior to signing the Maastricht Treaty which established the European Union, Ireland insisted that a provision be included - called Protocol 41 - which stipulated that the European Union would not interfere with Ireland's Constitutional ban on abortion.
The Irish people voted on 3 Referenda on the 25th November. Referenda on the right to travel and information were passed. The government campaigned strongly for a yes vote by saying that these were general liberties and not specific to abortion rights. The substantive issue (provision of abortion in Ireland) was rejected in a two-to-one majority.
Pro-life rally in Dublin 1992
The Fianna Fail / Labour Coalition enacted the Criminal Justice (Public Order Act) 1994, attempting to make pro-life demonstrations illegal
Patrick O'Dwyer, anti-abortion campaigner and member of the newly formed Muintir na hEireann was arrested in Dublin on the 22nd of April 1994 under Section 7 of the Act. The Act was used on numerous occasions to arrest participants of peaceful pro-life demonstrations.
Michael Noonan, Minister for Health, introduces the Regulation of Information (Services outside the State for Termination of Pregnancies) Act, which allows for abortion referral despite assurances to voters in the 1992 referendum that this in fact would not happen.
Article 26 of Bunreact na hEireann allows the President to refer a bill passed by both Houses of the Oireachtas to the Supreme Court which is required to pronounce on whether the bill, or any part of it is repugnant to the Constitution. Interestingly, once the bill is found to not be repugnant, and the bill is signed into law by the President, the law is immune from any other constitutional challenge under Article 34.3.3
This was the case for the Regulation of Information (Services outside the State for Termination of Pregnancies) Act.
The C Case saw the Eastern Health Board bring a minor, a 13-year-old pregnant rape victim, to England for an abortion against the wishes of her parents. It was very evident in the six weeks from the 13th of November that the Gardai, the Deptartment of Health, the Eastern Health Board, the State appointed judiciary and the politicians worked together to bring about the death of Baby C.
The Government invites members of the public to submit their views in order to publish a Green Paper on the topic of Abortion. 10,000 submissions are received of which over 99% are prolife. The Green Paper publishes 7 suggested recommendations only one of which is a total ban on abortion.
The All Party Committee on the Constitution hold public hearings on the issue of abortion and publish the 5th Progress Report - Abortion on their findings. 105,000 submisions were received from the public. Again over 99% were pro-life.
On Tuesday, 2nd October 2001, the Government published their proposed amendment to the constitution.
"The objective of the 25th amendment, entitled Protection of Human Life in Pregnancy, is to resolve the unsatisfactory legal situation regarding abortion that has existed since the X Case judgment in 1992," claimed An Taoiseach, Bertie Ahern.
If it had been approved by the people, the new provisions would have been inserted into the constitution as Article 40.3.4 and 40.3.5.
The amendment, which was seen by pro-life activists as a limited abortion amendment, was narrowly defeated. Pro-life organisations vowed to continue to work to save mothers and babies and to keep Ireland abortion free.
Bertie Ahern, then Taoiseach, after voting in the referendum in March 2002
In May 2007, a 17-year-old girl took a case to the High Court against a Health Service Executive (HSE) decision to stop her leaving the State for an abortion. She had been in the care of the HSE since February. 'Miss D' was four months pregnant and wanted to travel to the UK for an abortion. In his judgement Mr. J McKechnie gave his opinion that this case was not about a foetus with a disability but about a baby destined to die. He criticised the HSE’s handling of the case and their attempts to bring it within the ‘X’ case. Mr. J McKechnie then went on to say that in his opinion the right to travel inserted into the Constitution by the 1992 referendum, takes precedent over the right to life of the unborn. He then set aside the order of the District Court.
In December 2009 a case was heard in the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), ABC v. Ireland. The plaintiffs in the case are three anonymous women (referred to as “A,” “B,” and “C”) who are challenging Ireland’s protection of the unborn. They have petitioned the Court to create a “right to abortion” in the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) and ask that the abortion “right” trump the right to life guaranteed in Ireland’s Constitution. Such a holding by the ECHR would be a striking departure from the European practice of leaving the resolution of such issues to the member states.
The Court ruled, on 16 December 2010, that by eleven votes to six, that there had been no violation of Article 8 (right to private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights in respect of the first and the second applicants (A and B), and unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 8 respect of the third applicant (C).
Prior to a general election in February 2011, Fine Gael, the main opposistion party at the time, made a promise to pro-life advocates that they would not legalise abortion during their time in office. However, they went into coalition with the Labour Party, who wish to see abortion legalised on grounds similar to the British model, and a campaign for legalised abortion almost immediately began.
The government set up a so-called expert group to examine the judgement of the ECHR ruling and the implications of the 'X' case judgment. This Expert Group on Abortion released its findings in November 2012, saying that Ireland was obliged to implement the court's decision and recommending legislative and statutory reform
On 30 April 2013, the government published 33 pages of draft legislation for the Protection of Life during Pregnancy Bill 2013 (previously entitled Protection of Maternal Life Bill 2013) with the intention of enacting the legislation before the 2013 Dáil summer recess.